Live Nation is facing strong criticism after internal messages from 2022 became public through a recent court filing.
The exchange involved two regional ticketing directors, Ben Baker and Jeff Weinhold, and quickly sparked concern over how fees are handled.
According to a report by Bloomberg, the Slack conversation showed the two discussing extra charges added to ticket prices.
In the messages, Baker admitted that he applied high additional fees on top of base ticket costs.
He also suggested that fans often paid these charges without much resistance, which led him to take advantage of the situation.
The conversation included examples of pricing decisions, such as charging separate fees for parking and closer access areas.
In that context, Baker described the approach as highly profitable, indicating that these add-ons significantly increased revenue.
In response, Live Nation stated that the messages do not represent the company’s values or how it operates.
The company explained that the exchange was informal and did not reflect official policy or decision-making.
It also noted that leadership only became aware of the messages when they entered the public domain and has since begun reviewing the situation.
The messages did not appear on their own. They surfaced as part of a larger legal battle that is still ongoing.
The U.S. Department of Justice is leading an antitrust lawsuit. It targets Live Nation and its ticketing platform, Ticketmaster.
Through this case, the internal exchanges have now come into public view.
Read more: Black Coffee Announces Ibiza [UNVRS] 2026 Shows
How The Lawsuit Against Live Nation Started
The case, first filed in 2024, claims that the company gained significant control of the US live events market after its 2010 merger.
This position has raised serious concerns among critics. They argue that it opened the door to higher fees across the board.
Over time, competition began to shrink.
In turn, many artists felt pushed to depend on the company’s services, not only for ticketing but also for promotion.
The lawsuit also addresses Ticketmaster’s SafeTix system.
While the technology uses rotating barcodes to reduce fraud, critics claim it may limit access for competing platforms.
Recently, the trial resumed after 32 states rejected a proposed settlement.
The deal would have required Live Nation to make half of its tickets available to other platforms, limit service fees, and give up control of several venues.
However, many states argued that these measures did not go far enough to protect consumers.
Meanwhile, seven states, including Arkansas and Iowa, agreed to the settlement terms.
Still, the broader disagreement highlights ongoing concerns about fairness in ticket pricing and market control.
In a related development, the court denied Live Nation’s request to exclude the Slack messages from the case.
This decision ensures that the exchange between Baker and Weinhold will remain part of the legal proceedings as the case moves forward.
